This study intended to find out the most substantial items in cold and heat pattern identification(CHPI)
questionnaire based on usual symptoms through CHPI diagnosis and evaluation by experts. 120 participants, faculties
of OO university, filled out CHPI questionnaire based on usual symptoms by the way of self-reporting. Then 2 Korean
Medicine doctors independently diagnosed them whether they belonged to cold pattern identification(PI) or heat PI, and
scored the result of it. Pearson correlation of 2 experts was 0.649 in cold PI and 0.605 in heat PI. Agreement was
75.8%(Kappa value 0.516) in cold PI and 74.2%(Kappa value 0.465) in heat PI. Pearson correlation of 2 experts was
0.649 in cold PI and 0.605 in heat PI. Agreement between two experts was 75.8%(Kappa value 0.516) in cold PI and
74.2%(Kappa value 0.465) in heat PI. Items of high correlation with experts’ evaluation followed next: “do not usually
like the cold”, “usually like the warm”, “usually feel cold” in cold PI and “do not usually like the hot”, “usually feel
hot”, “usually feel burning sensation in the body” in heat PI. We could infer from that facts that experts give weight
on ‘subjective feeling of cold or heat in participants body’ and ‘preference on sensation of cold and heat’. We also
expect this study to be an epidemiological foundation to disclose correlation between usual CHPI and diseases. |
