|
This study aims to reveal understanding of general users on pattern identification questionnaire items from published papers. 132 questionnaire items were selected from five papers which studied reliability and validity of survey items for pattern identification. 36 general participants answered understanding degree on each items, 11 experts also responded clinical utilizability on these. 6 questionnaire items had different recognition between general participants and experts, which were well used items to diagnose for experts, not easily understood to general participants. This study is the first work to analyze pattern identification’s item understanding of general participants. Diversified subject population should be involved in further studies for assessment of general participants’ understanding degree of questionnaire items. |
